Wednesday, June 16, 2010

On Moroccan Citizen Media


By Jamal Elabiad

It’s no secret that journalists who toe the Moroccan government’s official line are a majority in Morocco. Many reasons lie behind that, one is that most journalists who dared to trespass the red-lines were sent to prison or banned from practising journalism. Think of Ali Lamrabet, Driss Chatane, Taoufik Bouachrine, and Abou Bakr Jamai.

The common denominator between the Moroccan government journalists is to avoid shedding light on all topics that will surely enrage the regime, such as the monarchy, Islam, the judiciary, and the Sahara. This is why Moroccans had no choice but to boycott the newspapers and TV channels those journalists work for and look for other forms of journalism that will let them know about those taboo topics and see the face of their country without cosmetics.

Citizen media, as a result, has become among the principal sources most Moroccans heavily rely on for news and information on their country. Citizen journalists, in brief, report on issues the Moroccan government does not want its citizens to know about. And what really makes most professional journalists different from citizen ones is that the latter see Morocco as it is, not as the government wants them to see it.

According to Mark Glaser, a freelance journalist who has written many articles on new media, “The idea behind citizen journalism is that people without professional journalism training can use the tools of modern technology and the global distribution of the Internet to create, augment or fact-check media on their own or in collaboration with others. For example, you might write about a city council meeting on your blog or in an online forum. Or you could fact-check a newspaper article from the mainstream media and point out factual errors or bias on your blog. Or you might snap a digital photo of a newsworthy event happening in your town and post it online. Or you might videotape a similar event and post it on a site such as YouTube.”

Examples of the events that Moroccans, without citizen journalists, would have known nothing about are the scandal of the communication minister Khalid Naciri and his son, the protests that some forgotten areas in Morocco have witnessed, including Sidi Ifni and Tarhjicht, and the jobless people in Morocco who protest at unemployment through burning themselves alive. Needless to say almost all Moroccan TV channels and newspapers did not cover such events.

The reasons behind the emergence of citizen journalists in Morocco are many, one is reporting without red-lines. A slew of Moroccan citizen journalists have discussed topics the majority of professional journalists have never even thought of discussing. It’s, for instance, the writing on the monarchy and judiciary that led Mohamed Erraji and Hassan Barhoun respectively to prison. By the way, the majority of citizen journalists in Morocco post articles, videos, and photos on their weblogs and some social networks under a pseudonym for fear of being arrested.

Finally, citizen journalists are not people who hate Morocco, have bad intentions towards it, or aim at tarnishing its image abroad. Citizen journalists are people who harshly criticize their country not because they hate it, but because they want it to become a real place of democracy, freedom of expression, human rights, and equality before the law. It really honors me to be one of them.

This article first appeared on Talk Morocco.

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Some Moroccans are More Equal Than Others!


By Jamal Elabiad

Last year, I gave in an article many pieces of advice for all Arabs and Muslims. One of those pieces is “Don’t think of becoming a police officer. Most police officers can’t arrest a minister’s son!” And the year before last, I concluded one of my articles with the fact that “In true democracies, punitive laws apply to all citizens without exception, while in false democracies, punitive laws apply only to second-class citizens or “bouzabal” in Moroccan Arabic (darija).” What made me remind you of this is the scandal of the current Moroccan communication minister Khalid Naciri and his son.

The scandal, in brief, broke out when a policeman arrested the week before last Khalid Naciri’s son for assaulting and stabbing a motorist in front of the parliament building in Rabat. Soon after learning of his son’s arrest, the communication minister showed up personally at the scene. "Are you going to let the boy go, or should I do my work?" is the threat, according to eye witnesses, the minister used to force the policeman to release his son. As a result, the policeman had no choice but to set Naciri’s son free in disapproval of the citizens who observed the incident. For more details, watch the video.

Right after I finished watching the video, I came to the following conclusions.

What the communication minister has done shows beyond doubt that all Moroccans are equal, but some Moroccans are more equal than others.

What the communication minister has done means that Moroccans whose family members are ministers or senior officials are above the law.

What the communication minister has done is a clear sign of the fact that something is rotten in the kingdom of Morocco.

What the communication minister has done deals another blow to the image of Morocco abroad.

What the communication minister has done means that those who pass laws are still the first to break them. The communication minister is an example in point.

What the communication minister has done is the kind of news some Algerian and Spanish newspapers are looking for.

What the communication minister has done means that he’s among those whose interests and privileges will be in danger if the North African monarchy becomes a place of democracy, freedom of expression, human rights, and equality before the law.

What the communication minister has done is what Amnesty International and Transparency International focus on to write their reports on human rights abuses and corruption in many countries around the world, including Morocco.

What the communication minister has done shows that Moroccan ministers throw stones at others though their houses are made of glass. Think of Khalid Naciri’s sharp criticism of Transparency International reports.

What the communication minister has done is an example of what happens behind closed doors.

What the communication minister has done shows that human rights abuses are among the trivialities Khalid Naciri has no time to waste on.

What the communication minister has done is what made the majority of Moroccans lose faith in the elections.

What the communication minister has done means that Comrades in Morocco turn their coats soon after they become VIPs.

What the communication minister has done is among the means some terrorist networks employ to sow the seeds of terrorism.

Lastly, what the communication minister has done shows beyond doubt that today’s Morocco is no different than the Morocco of yesteryear. In other words, reforms in Morocco are only a varnish. Underneath it lies the same old Morocco!