
By Jamal Elabiad
Recently, I was a member of a committee whose job was testing the competence of two novice teachers of English. The committee consisted of the supervisor and two teachers, myself included. This is the first time I have been selected for this duty.
Soon after receiving the invite from the delegation of the ministry of education, I started gathering information on how to judge whether a teacher is competent or not. My sources were Mr. Google and some English language teaching ( ELT) books I xeroxed when I was a teacher trainee at Meknes pedagogic center.
The topic that took the lion’s share of my preparation time was the circumstances under which teachers can deliver a lesson employing information and communications technology (ICT), for a slew of teachers, to my knowledge, made use of ICT only on the day of the competence test, or when they were asked by their supervisors to present a lesson in the presence of their colleagues. By the way, ICT includes virtually any device that can access, present, manipulate and communicate words, sounds and images to enable us to create meaning.
Before going into details, it’s noteworthy that ICT is not a top priority yet for those in charge of the Moroccan education system due to the fact that the bulk of Moroccan schools are deprived of Informatics teachers though they were provided with the necessary equipment such as computers. To solve the problem, some teachers at the school where I teach volunteer from time to time to teach students the ABC of Informatics.
After reading a number of articles, I came to the conclusion that ICT is a form of going beyond the textbook ( GBT). In other words, teachers can produce their own materials if their objectives will not be achieved using the textbook materials, or if they want to teach their students things the textbook doesn’t cover.
Accidentally, one of the teachers utilised an overhead projection device and a laptop to present a vocabulary lesson. Frankly, the teacher managed to meet his objectives. And self-confidence, American-like pronunciation, and the use of humour and praises are among the things I liked most about the teacher.
One of the questions I asked the teacher during discussion of the lesson was what was your rationale behind teaching with ICT? The reason the teacher gave was unconvincing and had nothing to do with GBT.
Had I been the teacher, I would have simply used the textbook materials, for the latter are similar to the ones prepared by the teacher.
I wish the teacher we tested is not among the teachers who think ICT is only for taking competence tests or giving demo lessons!
